Yes, in the United States, eSignatures are legally recognized under federal and state laws, enabling secure, efficient, and paperless transactions. The Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act (ESIGN Act) and the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act (UETA) provide the legal framework that recognizes eSignatures as equivalent to handwritten signatures.
eSignatures are recognized under the Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act (ESIGN Act) and the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act (UETA). These laws align with international standards like the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) Model Law on Electronic Commerce (MLEC).
Enacted: 2000
The ESIGN Act affirms that electronic signatures and records have the same legal effect as traditional paper documents and handwritten signatures. This federal law facilitates the use of electronic records and signatures in interstate and foreign commerce, promoting efficiency and reducing paperwork.
Adopted by States: Starting in 1999
The UETA is a model law adopted by 49 states of the United States, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and the US Virgin Islands. It provides a legal framework for electronic transactions, ensuring that electronic records and signatures are treated equivalently to their paper-based counterparts.
These legal frameworks have been instrumental in the widespread adoption of eSignatures across various sectors in the United States, enabling businesses and individuals to conduct transactions efficiently and securely online.
Note: New York remains the only state that has not adopted the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act (UETA). Instead, it implemented its own statute, the Electronic Signatures and Records Act (ESRA), which makes electronic signatures legally binding in the state.
The United States recognizes a wide range of eSignatures under the ESIGN Act and UETA, from simple eSignatures to more secure digital and biometric signatures. Each type of signature serves different purposes and levels of security, making it essential to choose the appropriate method based on the specific requirements of the transaction.
Unlike some jurisdictions, such as the European Union with its distinct classifications of eSignatures (simple, advanced, and qualified under eIDAS), the US legal framework does not formally classify eSignatures into these specific categories. Instead, it provides broad recognition and acceptance of eSignatures based on certain requirements.
Here is a detailed overview of the different types of eSignatures accepted in the US:
Simple electronic signatures are the most basic form of eSignature. They involve any electronic method used to signify agreement or consent without specific security measures.
Examples:
Use cases:
Digital signatures use cryptographic techniques to secure the signature and verify the signer's identity. Digital signatures are created using a digital certificate issued by a trusted certificate authority (CA).
Examples:
Use cases:
Biometric signatures involve the use of unique biological characteristics of the signer for authentication. This method ensures that the signature is uniquely tied to the individual, providing a high level of security.
Examples:
Use cases:
Clickwrap signatures involve users indicating their agreement to terms and conditions by clicking a checkbox or button. This type of signature is commonly used for online agreements.
Examples:
Use cases:
To ensure that an eSignature is legally valid and enforceable, the following basic criteria must be met:
Both the sender and the recipient must agree to use eSignatures for their transaction. This consent is typically documented during the signing process, either through an explicit opt-in mechanism or by using software that logs the agreement to sign electronically. Without clear consent, the validity of the eSignature could be challenged.
Example: An online form where users check a box agreeing to use eSignatures for the agreement.
The signer’s identity must be verifiable to establish that the eSignature is authentic and legally attributable to them. Common methods of identity verification include email authentication, multi-factor authentication (MFA), secure login credentials, or using a digital certificate issued by a trusted certificate authority (CA). For high-value or sensitive transactions, additional verification measures may be implemented.
Example: A digital signature platform that requires users to enter a one-time password (OTP) sent to their registered mobile phone.
Once an eSignature is applied, the document should be locked or encrypted to prevent unauthorized modifications. Reliable eSignature platforms use hashing algorithms and encryption techniques to maintain the document’s integrity, creating a secure and immutable record of the transaction.
Example: A contract signed using a digital signature that shows an alert if any changes are made after the signature is applied.
A complete and accessible record of the eSignature process must be maintained. This includes a log of all actions taken during the signing process, such as timestamps, IP addresses, and user authentication data. These audit trails serve as evidence in case of disputes and help organizations comply with regulatory requirements for recordkeeping.
Example: An eSignature platform that keeps a secure, time-stamped audit trail of each step in the signing process, from document creation to final signature.
While eSignatures offer convenience and efficiency, they are not universally accepted for all types of documents and transactions in the United States. Certain documents and situations require traditional handwritten signatures or other forms of authentication.Â
Key exceptions include:
Documents related to the distribution of an individual’s estate after death require many formalities and witnesses to prevent fraud and ensure authenticity.
Legal documents and agreements related to family law, such as adoption papers and divorce decrees are matters that often involve complex legal and emotional considerations, requiring additional safeguards and in-person verification.
eSignatures are not valid for official court documents, including orders, notices, and other judicial paperwork. Courts typically require original signatures to maintain the integrity and authority of legal proceedings.
Notices regarding the discontinuation of essential services such as water, electricity, and gas can significantly impact individuals' lives, requiring a higher standard of communication and verification.
eSignatures are not valid for documents related to the default on loans, repossession of property, foreclosure proceedings, and eviction notices. These notices involve significant legal and financial consequences, necessitating additional precautions.
Communications about the termination or cancellation of insurance policies affect critical aspects of an individual’s well-being and financial security, requiring heightened security and clarity.
Notifications about product recalls and documents related to the handling and disposal of hazardous materials often involve safety and regulatory compliance, demanding stringent verification methods.
eSignatures are not valid for specific transactions under the UCC, such as those involving negotiable instruments (for example, checks), and certain investment securities. The UCC has specific requirements and formalities that must be followed to ensure the legality and enforceability of these transactions.
eSignatures have become an integral part of business processes across various industries in the United States, driven by the need for efficiency, security, and convenience. Several key sectors have embraced eSignatures for streamlining operations and enhancing customer experiences.
In the United States, the regulatory framework for eSignatures is governed primarily by the Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act (ESIGN Act) and the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act (UETA).Â
While these laws provide the legal foundation, there isn’t a single centralized regulatory authority that oversees eSignatures. Instead, their implementation and enforcement involve various stakeholders:
Ensuring compliance with the legal and regulatory standards for eSignatures involves a combination of using the right tools and following best practices. Here are practical tips to stay compliant:
The information in this guide is intended for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Laws regarding eSignatures may vary by jurisdiction and are subject to change. We recommend consulting with qualified legal counsel to determine how these laws apply to your business or organization. Signeasy does not assume responsibility for the accuracy or reliability of this information as it applies to specific cases.
ESIGN Act: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/PLAW-106publ229/pdf/PLAW-106publ229.pdfÂ
UETA: https://www.uniformlaws.org/committees/community-home?CommunityKey=2c04b76c-2b7d-4399-977e-d5876ba7e034
‍https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/prelim@title15/chapter96&edition=prelim
‍https://its.ny.gov/system/files/documents/2024/05/nys-g04-001-electronic-signatures-and-records-act-esra.pdf