What is the ESIGN Act?

In 2000, the U.S. government passed the ESIGN Act to ease the adoption of electronic signatures, ushering in a new era of document streamlining in all US locations where federal law applies. According to the act, an electronic signature is “an electronic sound, symbol, or process, attached to or logically associated with a contract or other record and executed or adopted by a person with the intent to sign the record.” This act ensures that:

• eSignatures can be used in a court of law as evidence
• eSIgnatures are as legally viable an option as wet signatures
• The effect, validity, and enforceability of electronic documents are not denied.

The relation between UETA and ESIGN Act

In addition to the ESIGN Act, the Uniform Law Commission drafted UETA (Uniform Electronic Transactions Act) in 1999 to provide a legal framework for electronic signature use per state. It outlines the legalities ESIGNatures relating to everything from transferable records to automated transactions and retention of records. 48 US states have adopted UETA. While Illinois and New York have not adopted UETA, they have implemented similar statutes validating e-signatures. In the United States, the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act (UETA) 1999 and the Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act (ESIGN) 2000 admit the validity and enforceability of electronic signatures.

The UETA and the ESIGN Act cover commercial transactions and therefore do not pertain to records used unilaterally or which do not relate to business, commercial (including consumer), or governmental affairs. They also specify exemptions to the use of electronic signatures in certain documents, such as those relating to the creation and execution of wills, adoption, divorce, or other matters of family law. Please review the list of exemptions under section 103 of the ESIGN act, and consult with legal counsel to identify relevant exclusion categories.

• Illinois’ Electronic Signature Law 5 ILCS 175/1-101, also enacted in 1999, considers some types of ESIGNatures to be more secure than others. Some of the factors that define such ESIGNatures are:
  a. Both parties concur on the 'secure nature' of the signature
  b. Applied by both parites in a verifiable manner
  c. Created in a manner that can be deemed commercially reasonable
  d. Can be relied upon by all parties in good-faith

• The Electronic Signatures and Records Act (ESRA), enacted in 2000, deems electronic Signatures as legally binding as wet signatures in New York. There is even a best practices guide for those who wish to use ESIGNatures under the ambit of ESRA.

History of electronic signature law in the United States

The history of electronic signature law in the United States is rooted in the need for businesses to streamline transactions securely and efficiently in a digital world. 

The turning point came in 2000 when the Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act (ESIGN Act) was passed. This landmark legislation established that electronic signatures hold the same legal weight as handwritten ones, ensuring they are enforceable across all U.S. states, provided they meet certain conditions like the intent to sign, consent to do business electronically, and clear association with the document.

Before the ESIGN Act, the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act (UETA) was introduced in 1999 as a model law for states. It aimed to provide a consistent legal framework for electronic signatures and records, allowing states to adopt it according to their legal systems. 

Together, UETA and the ESIGN Act created a unified approach to electronic signatures, giving businesses confidence that their digital contracts would be legally recognized and valid across state lines.

For businesses, understanding these laws is crucial. Compliance with electronic signature standards not only reduces paper waste and expedites agreements but also minimizes risk by ensuring legal enforceability. This means organizations can confidently transition their contract workflows online, knowing that they are protected under federal and state regulations.

Timeline of electronic signature laws in the U.S.

1999 - Uniform Electronic Transactions Act (UETA):

• The UETA was developed to establish a legal framework for electronic records and signatures, providing consistency across states for electronic transactions.
• States could adopt the UETA to ensure legal equivalency between electronic and handwritten signatures within their jurisdictions.

2000 - Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act (ESIGN Act):

• Signed into law on June 30, 2000, by President Bill Clinton.
• Established that electronic signatures are legally binding and equivalent to handwritten signatures nationwide.
• Supported the UETA by ensuring that electronic signatures are enforceable across state lines, regardless of individual state adoption.

2001 - Adoption of UETA by States:

• Following the ESIGN Act, states began adopting the UETA to align with federal standards. By 2001, many states had passed their versions of the UETA, ensuring a consistent framework for electronic transactions.

2010s - Expanded use of electronic signatures across industries:

• As businesses increasingly transitioned to digital operations, electronic signature usage became more widespread across sectors like real estate, finance, and legal services.
• Software providers expanded their offerings to meet compliance standards under UETA and the ESIGN Act.

2019 - Remote Online Notarization (RON) Legislation expands:

• States like Virginia, Florida, and Texas enacted laws permitting Remote Online Notarization (RON), allowing notaries to perform notarizations using audio-visual technology.
• By 2019, more states followed suit, and today over 40 states have enacted RON legislation, expanding the scope and convenience of e-signatures.

2020 - Accelerated adoption due to COVID-19 pandemic:

• The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the need for digital solutions, including electronic signatures and RON, as businesses transitioned to remote work environments.
• Temporary emergency measures were put in place to permit electronic notarizations and signatures in more states, many of which were later made permanent.

2020s - eIDAS compatibility and cross-border compliance:

• The U.S. began aligning its electronic signature practices with international standards like the EU’s eIDAS Regulation to facilitate smoother cross-border transactions.
• This alignment ensured that U.S. electronic signatures met global compliance standards, making international digital contracts enforceable and legally recognized.

2021 - Adoption of blockchain technology in electronic records:

• States like Vermont and Arizona passed laws recognizing blockchain technology as a secure method for managing electronic records and signatures.
• Blockchain-based solutions were acknowledged for their security and transparency, offering businesses a new, legally supported way to verify and store digital signatures.

2022 - Increased focus on privacy and security standards:

• In response to privacy regulations like the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) and the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), electronic signature solutions enhanced their security and encryption features.
• These updates ensured that e-signature processes complied with both federal and state data protection laws, providing businesses and consumers with greater transparency and data security.

2023 - Updates in multifactor authentication (MFA) and biometric verification:

• As security concerns increased, businesses began integrating multifactor authentication (MFA) and biometric verification (e.g., fingerprint and facial recognition) into e-signature processes.
• Legal guidelines clarified how these methods fit within the requirements of the ESIGN Act and UETA, ensuring compliance while enhancing security.

2024 - Widespread adoption of RON and eSignatures in healthcare and real estate:

• The adoption of RON expanded further, with most states having RON legislation, ensuring its use in high-compliance industries like real estate and healthcare.
• The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) provided specific guidance on using e-signatures for telehealth and electronic medical records (EMR) systems, highlighting the growing trust and reliance on e-signature technology in critical sectors.

US life sciences regulations (21 CFR Part II)

In the United States, the life sciences industry is regulated under various standards to ensure the safety, quality, and efficacy of products like pharmaceuticals, biologics, and medical devices. One of the most critical regulations is 21 CFR Part 11, which is enforced by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). It sets the standards for electronic records and electronic signatures used in FDA-regulated industries. 

Key requirements of 21 CFR Part 11

1. Validation of systems: Electronic systems must be validated to ensure accuracy, reliability, and consistent intended performance. Companies must maintain documentation proving the systems meet these requirements.
2. Audit Trails: The regulation mandates that systems must have secure, computer-generated, time-stamped audit trails that track changes made to electronic records. This ensures data integrity and accountability, allowing regulators to trace the history of any record.
3. User authentication and access controls: To prevent unauthorized access, systems must have secure user authentication methods (e.g., usernames, passwords, biometric controls). Only authorized personnel should have access to critical systems and information.
4. Electronic signature standards: Electronic signatures used under Part 11 must be uniquely identifiable to the individual and include two components (such as a combination of user ID and password or biometric data). The signature must be legally binding and have the same authority as handwritten signatures, with clear links to the associated electronic records.
5. Record retention and security: Companies must implement security measures to protect electronic records from loss, unauthorized access, or alterations. The regulation also requires records to be retained for a specific period, as stipulated by other relevant FDA guidelines.

Importance for businesses

For companies operating in the life sciences sector, compliance with 21 CFR Part 11 is crucial. It ensures that electronic records and signatures used in their operations are legally compliant, reliable, and secure. 

‍

Compliance not only mitigates regulatory risks but also enhances operational efficiency by enabling the use of modern digital systems and technologies, such as automated data management and electronic submissions to the FDA.

‍

Non-compliance can lead to severe consequences, including warning letters, fines, or even product recalls. Therefore, businesses must implement robust procedures, validation protocols, and secure systems to meet 21 CFR Part 11 requirements, ensuring their electronic data and records are trustworthy and regulatory compliant.

‍

How to ensure that an electronic signature is ESIGN compliant?

Intent

As with traditional wet ink signatures, electronic signatures are valid only if a user demonstrates a clear intent to sign. For example, Signeasy allows users to opt-out of electronically signing a document by providing the option to decline signature requests.

Consent

The respective parties must express or imply their consent to do business electronically. Most leading e-signature software prompts users to confirm their consent before they sign.

Proof of signing

The context and circumstances under which the document was signed can indicate the attribution of an electronic signature. Signeasy ensures proper attribution by providing users with a detailed audit trail. This trail goes from the signer’s email ID to the device IP address to the signature timestamp each time they sign a document electronically.

Attribution

An electronic signature must be connected or associated with the document being signed by indicating a process by which the signature was created or by creating a graphical or textual statement, which gets added to the signed record. It is critical for electronic signatures to be connected to the document being signed. For example, Signeasy does not allow electronic signatures to be transmitted to anyone except as part of a signed document sent by the signer.

Record Retention

An electronically signed document must be in the form of an electronic record capable of retention by the recipient at the time of receipt. The sender or the information processing system must not inhibit the ability of the recipient to print or store the electronic record for later reference.

Are electronic signatures legally binding and enforceable?

Both the UETA and ESIGN ACT laws explicitly provide that “a signature, contract, or other record relating to such [commercial] transaction may not be denied legal effect, validity, or enforceability solely because it is in electronic form."

An electronic signature is an electronic sound, symbol, or process, attached to or logically associated with a contract or other record and executed or adopted by a person intending to sign the record.

The acts establish the general rule that electronic signatures are valid and enforceable, provided certain requirements are established. The legal admissibility of electronic signatures is well-established in the United States. To ensure that the electronic document can be authenticated and admitted as evidence, it is important to maintain an audit trail that logs the actions taken by the parties electronically signing documents.

ESIGNature compliance across the world

ESIGNature laws in the UK 🇬🇧

• Electronic Communications Act 2000
• Electronic Signatures Regulations 2002
• Electronic Identification, Authentication, and trust Services (eIDAS)

ESIGNature laws in India 🇮🇳

• Information Technology Agreement (ITA)
• Indian Contract Act (ICA)
• Electronic Signature or Electronic Authentication Technique and Procedure Rules (ESEATPR)

ESIGNature laws in South Africa 🇿🇦

• Electronic Communications and Transactions Act (ECTA) 

ESIGNature laws in Canada 🇨🇦

• Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA)‍
• The Uniform Electronic Commerce Act (UECA)

Benefits and Limitations of the ESIGN Act

The ESIGN Act offers numerous benefits for individuals and organizations seeking to embrace electronic signatures. Firstly, it enhances efficiency by streamlining document signing processes, eliminating the need for physical paperwork and reducing turnaround times. This efficiency leads to significant cost savings by reducing expenses associated with printing, paper, postage, and document storage. Additionally, electronic signatures provide convenience and accessibility, allowing individuals to sign documents from anywhere at any time using various devices. They also offer enhanced security measures, such as encryption and authentication, ensuring the integrity and non-repudiation of signed documents. However, it is important to be aware of the limitations and exceptions of the ESIGN Act. Certain types of documents may be excluded from its scope, and specific industries may have additional compliance obligations. Compliance with consent and disclosure requirements is also crucial for maintaining the enforceability of electronic signatures. Nevertheless, by understanding and adhering to the ESIGN Act's provisions, businesses can fully leverage the benefits of electronic signatures while ensuring legal validity and reliability.

Advantages of using electronic signatures under the ESIGN Act:

• Increased efficiency: Electronic signatures streamline document signing processes, eliminating the need for physical paperwork, mailing, or in-person meetings.
• Cost savings: Adopting electronic signatures reduces costs associated with printing, paper, ink, postage, and storage of physical documents.
• Time savings: Electronic signatures enable faster turnaround times for signing documents, accelerating business transactions and reducing delays.
• Convenience and accessibility: Electronic signatures allow individuals to sign documents from anywhere, at any time, using various devices such as computers, tablets, or smartphones.
• Enhanced security: Electronic signatures can offer advanced security measures, such as encryption and authentication, ensuring the integrity and non-repudiation of the signed documents.

Limitations and exceptions to the ESIGN Act:

• Certain types of documents may be excluded: The ESIGN Act does not apply to all types of documents, including wills, trusts, and other testamentary documents, certain family law matters, and court orders or notices.
• Inapplicability in specific industries: Some industries may have specific regulations or requirements that limit the use of electronic signatures. For example, healthcare-related documents may have additional compliance obligations under HIPAA.
• Consent and disclosure requirements: The ESIGN Act requires obtaining consent and providing necessary disclosures before conducting electronic transactions. Failing to comply with these requirements may affect the enforceability of electronic signatures.

Recognizing the legal weight and enforceability of electronic signatures:

• The ESIGN Act establishes the legal recognition of electronic signatures in interstate and foreign commerce in the United States.
• Under the ESIGN Act, electronic signatures carry the same legal weight and enforceability as traditional handwritten signatures.
• Courts and regulatory authorities recognize the validity and enforceability of electronic signatures, provided that they comply with the requirements outlined in the ESIGN Act.
• It's important to note that the legal weight and enforceability of electronic signatures may vary in different jurisdictions outside the United States, depending on local laws and regulations.

Industry-specific considerations for the ESIGN Act

Application of the ESIGN Act in specific industries (e.g., finance, healthcare):

• Finance industry: The ESIGN Act applies to various financial transactions, including loan agreements, insurance policies, investment documents, and electronic fund transfers. Financial institutions can leverage electronic signatures to streamline customer onboarding processes, account opening, and other financial transactions.
• Healthcare industry: The ESIGN Act has significant implications for the healthcare sector, allowing for electronic signatures on consent forms, patient records, telemedicine agreements, and other healthcare-related documents. However, healthcare organizations must also consider compliance with additional regulations such as the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) for maintaining patient privacy and data security.

Additional requirements or regulations applicable to specific industries:

• Real estate industry: While the ESIGN Act permits electronic signatures on real estate documents, there may be additional state-specific requirements or regulations to consider, such as the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act (UETA) or state-specific real estate laws.
• Government contracts: Government agencies and contractors must ensure compliance with specific regulations governing electronic signatures, such as the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), which may have additional requirements beyond the ESIGN Act.
• Legal profession: Lawyers and law firms should be aware of any state-specific rules of professional conduct regarding the use of electronic signatures, as well as any court-specific requirements for electronic filing and signatures.

Complying with industry-specific standards and guidelines:

• Each industry may have its own set of standards and guidelines related to electronic signatures and record-keeping. It is important for organizations to familiarize themselves with these standards and ensure compliance.
• For example, the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard (PCI DSS) provides guidelines for securely handling credit card information, including the use of electronic signatures in cardholder agreements and related documents.
• Similarly, organizations operating in highly regulated sectors, such as pharmaceuticals or aviation, should consider industry-specific regulations and standards when implementing electronic signatures to ensure compliance.

What are some exceptions to the ESIGN act?

The UETA and the ESIGN Act cover business, governmental affairs, and e-commerce transactions. But, they do not apply to the likes of wills and marriage, death, birth certificates, codicils, and testamentary trusts (as specified under section 103 of the ESIGN act). 

‍

Frequently asked questions

Q: What is the purpose of the Esign Act?

A: The purpose of the ESIGN Act is to grant electronic signatures the same legal status as handwritten signatures, ensuring that digital contracts and records are enforceable across the United States, thereby enabling secure and efficient electronic transactions.

‍

Q: What are the two ESIGN Act requirements?

A: The ESIGN Act has two primary requirements to ensure the validity of electronic signatures. First, there must be a clear intent to sign, meaning the signer must voluntarily and deliberately indicate their agreement to the electronic document. Second, there must be consent to do business electronically, which requires that all parties involved agree to conduct their transactions electronically, typically confirmed through electronic disclosures and agreements. These requirements safeguard the integrity and enforceability of electronic contracts.

‍

Q: Does the ESIGN Act apply to all types of documents?

A: No, the ESIGN Act does not apply to all documents. Certain documents, like wills, court orders, foreclosure notices, and some family law documents, are excluded and still require traditional handwritten signatures to ensure their authenticity and validity.

‍

Q: What is required to prove the authenticity of an electronic signature under the ESIGN Act?

A: To prove the authenticity of an electronic signature, it must be uniquely linked to the signer, be verifiable, and demonstrate the signer’s intent. This may involve using secure methods like digital certificates, audit trails, or multi-factor authentication to validate the identity of the signer.

‍

Q: Can an electronic signature be used as evidence in court under the ESIGN Act?

A: Yes, electronic signatures are legally enforceable and can be used as evidence in court. As long as they meet the ESIGN Act requirements for intent and consent and are properly linked to the signer, they are considered valid and have the same legal effect as handwritten signatures.

‍